Watching a child grow and
develop is an interesting evolution to witness. The most intriguing development
is observing how the child finds her voice. Cultures are the same way. Every
culture, every political climate, each nation has a voice of its own, unique
from every other. These voices don’t come naturally or easily. The discovery is
a long arduous task. The American culture and tradition is no different. There
is a distinct quality to the American voice, regardless of the current
political name-calling and side-taking, regardless of the economic situation of
the country. There is a voice, an attitude that sets American fiction and
poetry apart from other Western literature. This voice wasn’t discovered
over-night. Over the 95 years between 1820 and 1915, the American literary
tradition moved from the Picaresque to the Romantic, from the Romantic to the
Naturalist, from the Naturalist into the
Realists, and from the Realist into the Modernist eras, carrying with it
traditions from each era into the next, building upon one another to form a
firm foundation and a sturdy framework to support the future generations of Post-Modernism and
Absurdist to come. Through this evolution, scholars of the American literary
tradition see the most growth in character development, plot structure, and
thematic under-pining, as America the country, grows and develops its unique
sound.
When
America first learned to tell stories, the Picaresque approach was the mode du
jour. It was in brief scenes with fantastical, over-the-top premises through
which the plot was driven, and characters were usually flat, two-dimensional
beings with no real outside motivations. One of the best examples of this form
of novel writing is The Pioneers, by
James Fennimore Cooper. The Pioneers,
by today’s standards can only barely be classified as a novel. There is a very
slight undercurrent moving the plot all the way through the book, however, for
the most part, Cooper moves readers along by jumping from one scene to the
other: first readers ride along with Judge Temple in his sleigh and they almost
go off a cliff, then the Judge fires blindly into the woods, thinking he’s hit
a deer, when he’s actually hit a person, we are moved through to a parlor
scene, and a “turkey hunt” if one can call it that, all the while there is only
the faintest breeze of continuity in the actual storyline, with dialogue that
seems incredibly stilted and dry. Elizabeth, Judge Temple, Louisa, every
character throughout The Pioneers is
static, flat, and two-dimensional, seemingly without outside motivation for his
or her actions, with the exception of Natty Bumppo. Yet, we even have a hard
time rounding out Natty, despite the fact that his apparent modicum operandi is
dictated by the laws of nature. because of its disparity with modern fiction, The Pioneers is a difficult read for
the casual reader.
Fortunately,
much in the same way a child’s ability to speak and communicate grows and
blossoms, as the burgeoning country began to grow and flourish, American
writers began finding a more effective way to of telling stories, and more
complex methods to critiquing and commenting on American culture. Nathaniel
Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter is a
masterful example of such. An American Romantic, Hawthorne employs tenets of
the genre to cast a critical eye upon American society of the 1840s, all the
while using the subterfuge of being critical of the Puritanical beliefs of the
1600s. Hawthorne seems to lambast the self-centredness of the American culture,
using Hester Prynn’s short-sightedness in seeing how her actions affect others
on the community, while at the same time fostering the idea of how
crowd-sourcing is detrimental to the functioning of a society. Hawthorne does
all this while employing a strong through-line in the plot, good (though not
excellent) dialogue, and characters that are slightly closer to filling out and
becoming three-dimensional. While modern readers might find the pacing of The Scarlet Letter a little slow,
Hawthorne – a mere twenty-seven years after Cooper – employs modern writing
techniques that most readers of today would be able to follow without much
struggle.
The
development of the American voice fully matured by the end of the nineteenth
century, moving into the twentieth century. By the time World War I started in 1914,
American Literature had moved through the clumsy adolescent phase, and became a
tradition on-par with its much-older sibling, English Literature. Willa Cather
best exemplifies how an author can use traditions of those who came before to
craft a novel that is compelling, harrowing, insightful, and overall a delight
to read. Cather’s book O Pioneers! is a work of fiction that
masterfully incorporates ideas of the Romantic and Naturalist movements, while
asking important questions of how best a society is to move forward, can
conservation be a part of that forward-moving dialogue, and what the role of
the individual is within society as a whole.
Using a plot structure that drives all the way through the novel and
incorporating new philosophies of the essence of time, Cather’s novel features
well-rounded, fully-fleshed characters who struggle with staying rooted to
their pasts and moving forward in a changing world. The character of Carl
forces readers to question whether or not there is a place for the Romantic
dreamer in a modernized society. The character of Ivar raises the question of
whether conservation has a place in growing society, and calls to account
whether a life rigidly adhering to the marking off of days and hours, can truly
be a fulfilling life. Yet, it is through the protagonist, Alexandra, that
readers find the balance. Alexandra is the embodiment of the spirit of America:
she holds on to old ideas, while embracing the new; she doesn’t live her life
counting the hours, instead choosing to make the hours and days count, and it
is because of this she and her farm thrive, and it can be inferred that Cather
meant the Alexandra character to resonate in this fashion.
American
fiction continues to test out new voices and becomes firmer in its ideals as it
ages, not always for the best. While American literary fiction is doing its
best to uphold the traditions of those who preceded – pushing against the
grain, asking the hard questions, combing the breadth of the soul – and
attempting to grow, American popular fiction has moved away from the
storytelling of old, focusing more on the quantity of the product, the earning
potential, over the quality of the material. Has this become the gold standard
for American culture, or is the literary tradition forcing a new standard?
Whatever the case may be, American fiction will continue to change and grow
with each passing generation. Our hope lies in those who will continue to
listen to those who came before, taking what is passed down, much like a child
receiving an inheritance, and who will create with it wonderful works that will
continue the evolution of the American voice, and that will be used in the
future to further the discussion of where we’ve come, and how far we still have
to go.
Comments
Post a Comment